The questions Article 6 asks, each with the paragraph it comes from, and Annex III as the Regulation lists it in your language, read as amended on 27 July 2026. The result is a written determination you can file: whether the Regulation reaches the system, whether it is high-risk on the product route or the list route, from which date, and what follows for a provider or a deployer. Nothing you type leaves this page.
AI system (optional, for the document title) Does one of the Article 2 exclusions apply? The Regulation does not apply to some systems at all. Three exclusions matter to a company; the open-source exclusion of Article 2(12) is not one of them, since it falls away for a system placed on the market as high-risk.
None of these The system is placed on the market, put into service or used exclusively for military, defence or national security purposes (Article 2(3)) The system is developed and put into service for the sole purpose of scientific research and development (Article 2(6)) The system is still in research, testing or development and has not been placed on the market or put into service; testing in real-world conditions is not covered by this (Article 2(8))
Is the system a product, or part of one, under the legislation listed in Annex I? Section A lists the New Legislative Framework acts: toys, recreational craft, lifts, equipment for explosive atmospheres, radio equipment, pressure equipment, cableways, personal protective equipment, gas appliances, medical devices and in vitro diagnostics. Section B lists civil aviation security, two- and three-wheel vehicles, agricultural vehicles, marine equipment, rail interoperability, motor vehicles, civil aviation, and, since 27 July 2026, the Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230, which moved from Section A. Software sold on its own is under neither unless it is one of these products.
No, the system is not a product or a component of a product under Annex I Yes, under an act in Section A of Annex I Yes, under an act in Section B of Annex I
Is the system intended for one of the uses listed in Annex III? Article 6(2) makes every system listed in Annex III high-risk by its intended purpose, wherever it is deployed. Pick the point that describes what the system is intended to do; the wording is the Regulation's own.
Is the system intended for one of the uses listed in Annex III? Choose a point of Annex III None of these describes the intended purpose (a) remote biometric identification systems. This shall not include AI systems intended to be used for biometric verification the sole purpose of which is to confirm that a specific natural person is the person he or she claims to be; (b) AI systems intended to be used for biometric categorisation, according to sensitive or protected attributes or characteristics based on the inference of those attributes or characteristics; (c) AI systems intended to be used for emotion recognition. AI systems intended to be used as safety components in the management and operation of critical digital infrastructure, road traffic, or in the supply of water, gas, heating or electricity. (a) AI systems intended to be used to determine access or admission or to assign natural persons to educational and vocational training institutions at all levels; (b) AI systems intended to be used to evaluate learning outcomes, including when those outcomes are used to steer the learning process of natural persons in educational and vocational training institutions at all levels; (c) AI systems intended to be used for the purpose of assessing the appropriate level of education that an individual will receive or will be able to access, in the context of or within educational and vocational training institutions at all levels; (d) AI systems intended to be used for monitoring and detecting prohibited behaviour of students during tests in the context of or within educational and vocational training institutions at all levels. (a) AI systems intended to be used for the recruitment or selection of natural persons, in particular to place targeted job advertisements, to analyse and filter job applications, and to evaluate candidates; (b) AI systems intended to be used to make decisions affecting terms of work-related relationships, the promotion or termination of work-related contractual relationships, to allocate tasks based on individual behaviour or personal traits or characteristics or to monitor and evaluate the performance and behaviour of persons in such relationships. (a) AI systems intended to be used by public authorities or on behalf of public authorities to evaluate the eligibility of natural persons for essential public assistance benefits and services, including healthcare services, as well as to grant, reduce, revoke, or reclaim such benefits and services; (b) AI systems intended to be used to evaluate the creditworthiness of natural persons or establish their credit score, with the exception of AI systems used for the purpose of detecting financial fraud; (c) AI systems intended to be used for risk assessment and pricing in relation to natural persons in the case of life and health insurance; (d) AI systems intended to evaluate and classify emergency calls by natural persons or to be used to dispatch, or to establish priority in the dispatching of, emergency first response services, including by police, firefighters and medical aid, as well as of emergency healthcare patient triage systems. (a) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities, or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities or on their behalf to assess the risk of a natural person becoming the victim of criminal offences; (b) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities as polygraphs or similar tools; (c) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities, or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, in support of law enforcement authorities to evaluate the reliability of evidence in the course of the investigation or prosecution of criminal offences; (d) AI systems intended to be used by law enforcement authorities or on their behalf or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities for assessing the risk of a natural person offending or re-offending not solely on the basis of the profiling of natural persons as referred to in Article 3(4) of Directive (EU) 2016/680, or to assess personality traits and characteristics or past criminal behaviour of natural persons or groups; (e) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities for the profiling of natural persons as referred to in Article 3(4) of Directive (EU) 2016/680 in the course of the detection, investigation or prosecution of criminal offences. (a) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies as polygraphs or similar tools; (b) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies to assess a risk, including a security risk, a risk of irregular migration, or a health risk, posed by a natural person who intends to enter or who has entered into the territory of a Member State; (c) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies to assist competent public authorities for the examination of applications for asylum, visa or residence permits and for associated complaints with regard to the eligibility of the natural persons applying for a status, including related assessments of the reliability of evidence; (d) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities, or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, in the context of migration, asylum or border control management, for the purpose of detecting, recognising or identifying natural persons, with the exception of the verification of travel documents. (a) AI systems intended to be used by a judicial authority or on their behalf to assist a judicial authority in researching and interpreting facts and the law and in applying the law to a concrete set of facts, or to be used in a similar way in alternative dispute resolution; (b) AI systems intended to be used for influencing the outcome of an election or referendum or the voting behaviour of natural persons in the exercise of their vote in elections or referenda. This does not include AI systems to the output of which natural persons are not directly exposed, such as tools used to organise, optimise or structure political campaigns from an administrative or logistical point of view. Is this type and model of the system already on the market or in service? Article 111(2) gives systems on the market before the date Chapter III applies a grace period: the Regulation reaches them only when their design changes significantly. Answer for the type and model, not the individual unit.
Yes, already placed on the market or put into service No, not yet
Which operator are you? A provider develops the system, or has it developed, and places it on the market or puts it into service under its own name (Article 3(3)); a deployer uses it under its own authority (Article 3(4)). A product manufacturer that places the system on the market together with its product under its own name is the provider (Article 25(3)).
The provider: we developed it and place it on the market or put it into service under our name A deployer: we use a system someone else provides A product manufacturer: we place the system on the market with our product, under our name (Article 25(3))
Answer the questions as far as they are asked and the determination is written here.